The Forsaken

What happens when you temporarily forsake one or more of your corporate values, intentionally or unintentionally?

In short, I have never been a party to such a situation so I don’t know. But I do see some clear paths that are likely:

The company learns to appreciate the benefit of the value.
This is the corporate equivalent of taking a sabbatical from sex just before the wedding. The basic concept is that the deprivation of something for a period of time makes it that much more desirable and enjoyable when it finally happens. While the analogy may (or may not) ring true for sex and marriage, there is a pivotal difference between the sex-marriage analogy and the corporation-values one. This difference comes from the fact that most people are able to let go of corporate values, especially ones they never truly aligned with, easier than they can part with the idea of something as strongly reinforcing as sexual contact. In order for this to work the reward at the end of the deprivation period must be strong enough to sustain the company throughout the entire deprivation period.

The company loses its desire to uphold the value.
This can happen for a couple reasons. First, the company may decide that the benefit, after the deprivation period, is not strong enough to warrant the wait period and they give it up. Second, people may gradually become accustomed to the value not being present. Either way, the populous gradually shifts their paradigm such that it excludes the value. Once this happens it is no longer a matter of reintroducing a previously held value but attempting to introduce a value that is now foreign. In order for the value to become a core part of the business again it will take extreme effort.

The company identity shifts.
There are two main reasons this can happen, the first of which is mentioned in the previous point. The second is that the growth of the company will dilute the population that still holds the value. This will typically be more prominent in high growth companies but can happen anywhere. For example, assume a company has 100 people, 70% of which are highly attuned to the value when it is forsaken. By the time the company reintroduces the value, they have grown to 300 employees. Assuming that the original 70% still are attuned to the value, which is highly unlikely, we now have diluted the workforce down to 23% of the people that are in accord with the value. This results in the same problem as the last point in that it will inevitably take a herculean effort to resurrect the original value.

People Leave, People Arrive
If people are so attuned to a value that the lack of that value separates them from the company they will likely become disenchanted. Once people become disenchanted they either create change or they move on. If the dropping of the initiative is involuntary these people will likely try to revive it. However, if the drop is intentional then people will typically just move on. With this transition, the company will begin to appear more attractive to individuals who struck a discord with the value. This will continue to shift the corporate personality away from the dropped value, making it harder to reintegrate in the future.

This is the typical path. This is what I would expect to happen. However, there are times when the unexpected choice ends up making the difference between levels of success or between success and failure. Every now and then you hear about a leader so aligned with his or her company that they are able to make bold moves, that the critics denounce, and bring about broad and positive change. On the face of it, dropping a corporate value seems like a bad move. Whether there are hidden benefits is something that I can’t see but await a case study that shows the true outcome of such a situation.


Book Review: Principle Centered Leadership

Principle Centered Leadership, by Steven Covey

4172k6q3y7l_sl500_aa240_.jpg

For the most part, this is a rehash of most of the concepts found in The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. If you have read that book already then you already know most of what you will learn in Principle Centered Leadership. However there are a couple new/newly spun things, most notable of which is the abundance mentality. This is the concept that there are two types of people in this world: abundance thinkers and scarcity thinkers. Scarcity thinkers are always competing for limited resources and approach everything with a win/lose mentality. Abundance thinkers understand that resources, positions, and opportunities are not really scarce but are abundant and approach everything with a win/win mentality.

If you haven’t read The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People then Principle Centered Leadership is a decent read and will help give a different perspective on the business world and life in general. However, if you have already read The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People I would recommend foregoing the reading of this book and instead reading up on the abundance mentality theory.

I’m not a huge fan of Covey’s writing style. I can’t pin it down but there is something about it that makes it hard for me to stay focused on the book. If you have read Covey before and have had trouble staying engaged, this book will be no exception. If you read Covey before and loved it, this book will likely be right up your alley.


Culture Kick

I’ve been on somewhat of a culture kick lately. I have always known the importance of corporate culture but for some reason my various observations have come to the forefront in recent weeks. I have recently posted about turning the opinion of a customer, core values, employee-management relations, and the public face of the company. All of these things have at least one thing in common: they are all an integral part of corporate culture.

When companies are small it is easy to convey culture. Less people means communication is easier and it is thus a simpler process to convey expectations. Likewise, when a company is small the individuals who do not fit into the corporate culture stick out and become rather apparent. However, as a company grows we often see that the communication becomes muddled and it is easier for anomalies to find their way in. If you study many successful large companies you will see that most of them are able to translate small company success into large company success through the proper maintenance of their corporate culture.

For a while now I have been watching my company grow and have been lucky enough to witness it shift from a small/medium to a large company mentality. My focus in school was on small business so I studied plenty of cases where small companies rapidly grew and how they handled the process. I have been very interested in seeing how upper management handled the process here. I am happy to say that we are doing a great job, at least from my vantage point.

We have had a few meetings lately where the CEO spent a few hours with a large group of people going over different aspects of our own corporate culture. We used to achieve this process through what we term “patio meetings”. In these patio meetings the entire staff would come to an open space, where ever one was available, and the CEO or someone else would talk to us. Many times the meeting was called to announce a new client or milestone but we rarely walked away from any meeting without first having a lesson in corporate culture instilled in us. As the company continues to grow it will inevitably become harder to maintain a strong culture through patio meetings alone. Recognizing this, the company created a “Management Development Program” geared towards teaching our culture through a series of seminars.

The road from a small company to a large company is difficult and fraught with perils. It is arguably more difficult than the road from nothingness to a small company. If history paints an accurate depiction of how to make this transition smoother, it will inevitably have to be tightly coupled with a strong corporate culture.